Total Pageviews

Showing posts sorted by relevance for query royal 10. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query royal 10. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, 27 January 2014

Edward Manning and the Court Battles Between the Underwood 5 and the Royal 10

Others will no doubt beg to differ, but in my opinion the Underwood 5 and the Royal 10 represent the all-time benchmarks in standard-size typewriters. For one thing, their commercial success was quite staggering - we are talking of sales in the millions. As Paul Roberts says at the Virtual Typewriter Museum, "The Royal 10 is another giant in the typewriter market. Like the Underwood 5, it is one of the machines that essentially marked the end of the history of typewriter development. Machines like the Royal 10 continued to be built for many decades, with most changes limited to cosmetic alterations."
What isn't a matter of opinion is that Edward James Manning had a hand in the development of both the  Underwood 5 and the Royal 10.
Manning was pretty much the leading typewriter "gun for hire" from the early 1890s until 1916 (when the photo at the top of this post was taken).  Manning had:
1883 - started as a teenage apprentice mechanic.
1884 - Joined Garvin, which was making the Hammond.
1886 - joined Hammond itself.
1895 - worked with Franz Xaver Wagner.
1896 - joined Underwood.
1907 - joined Royal.
There was much rejoicing at Underwood when Manning joined its ranks, having worked on the groundbreaking Wagner frontstrike with the inventor himself. And there was much gnashing of teeth when Manning was lured away from Underwood to join Ed Hess and Lewis Myers at Royal.
When Underwood took over making the Wagner, it effectively ended the 20-year quest for a fully visible typewriter and Underwood soon caught and passed pioneer manufacturer Remington in the marketplace. The 1901 Underwood 5 cemented the company's place at the head of the field and Underwood jealously protected that place.
So when, in 1914, Royal replaced its line of flatbed standard typewriters with the 10, this new "begging dog" machine was much too close for comfort, too close to the bone for Underwood to ignore.
Still smarting over Manning's defection seven years earlier, Underwood suspected Manning had taken with him to Royal the secrets of the Underwood 5's success.
In 1915, Underwood instigated legal action, first against Manning himself, then, having failed in that case, against Royal, each time claiming patent infringement.
 609036, Manning to Wagner, November 1897
612858, Manning to Wagner, May 1897
Underwood argued that a Manning patent from 1897, assigned by Manning to Wagner, belonged to Underwood, as it had taken over the Wagner company.
In the first instance, Underwood Typewriter Company versus Manning in the New York District Court in March 1915,  it was found that "An individual [Manning] cannot be held liable for infringement of a patent, where the alleged infringing device was made and sold by a corporation of which he was not in control [Royal], and which is not shown to be insolvent, independently of an action against the corporation." Decree was found for the defendant [Manning]. This action concerned letters patent No 612,858, granted on October 25, 1898, to Manning and assigned to the Wagner Typewriter Company, "of which the plaintiff [Underwood] is the successor.
"The circumstances of the entire matter are unusual. Action was brought upon two patents, the one involved in this suit and No 609,036.
"In this suit a motion was made for preliminary injunction, based upon the proposition that the defendant [Manning], as the patentee, could not contest the validity of the patent obtained upon his own application, and basing infringement upon allegations that the defendant [Manning]
 had entered into a contract with a rival corporation, which it was charged had used the inventions of the patents taken out by the defendant as manager and superintendent of the Royal Typewriter Company’s factory.
"The application for preliminary injunction was denied ..."
Two months later Underwood then took action in the Circuit Court of Appeals against the Royal Typewriter Company. Again Underwood lost, with costs being awarded to Royal.
624135, Wagner to Wagner Typewriter Company, December 1898
This time not only the Manning patent, No 609,036, but a Wagner patent, No 624,135 (issued May 2, 1899), and one from Edward Frank Kunath (1875-1947) for Underwood, No 845,240 (issued February 26, 1907), were in contention.
The court found that while each was "for a typewriter [they] do not cover any broad generic invention, but minor improvements only, and their claims, if valid, must be narrowly construed. As so construed, they are held not [to have been] infringed [by Royal].
845240, Kunath to Underwood, October 1905
Edward Frank Kunath
"In an overcrowded art, where a broad generic invention is not possible,  a defendant who omits altogether one element of a patented combination cannot be held an infringer, even though he makes another element do the double work.
"After the hearing, a motion was made by the complainant [Underwood] to add to the record letters patent No 1,100,301 issued to the defendant [Royal] as assignee of [Ed] Hess, June 16, 1914. This motion was granted. 
"The record shows that the typewriting art has been developing for at least 40 years, during which period, although the general principle of operation remained unchanged, innumerable changes have been made and minor improvements added.
1100301, Hess to Royal, November 1905
"At the dates of the Manning, Wagner and Kunath patents, there was no opportunity for a broad generic invention in typewriters and it cannot be successfully contended that the claims in issue cover such an invention. They must be strictly construed and limited to the precise improvements claimed. There is no room for the doctrine of equivalents. The main questions involved are whether the claims in suit are valid and if so whether they are infringed."
Here is the Manning story as of 1912:
 And at 1916:

Sunday, 1 March 2020

The Ultimate Typewriter Trust: Royal’s Imperialistic Plans to Take Over Underwood, Oliver, Blick Et Al, Then Crush the Union


This full-page advert appeared in the June 1907 issue of Typewriter Topics, just as the Ryans were announcing their control of the Royal Typewriter Company and plans were being made to transfer production to Hartford, Connecticut.
To which year should we accurately place the start of the Royal Typewriter Company? The choice of the present-day company, Royal Consumer Information Products, and of Wikipedia, is 1904, when the company was incorporated in New Jersey. But it wasn’t until 1905 that Edward B. Hess started reassigning some of his earlier typewriter patents to Royal. And it wasn’t until September 1906 that Royal actually produced a typewriter, from its factory in Brooklyn. Instead, should it be April 15, 1907, when the Ryan family took charge and Allan Ryan talked about “forming the present company”? Certainly the “ultimate typewriter trust” publicity campaign, clearly engineered by the Ryans in September of that year, made the whole typewriter world sit up and take notice of Royal. It had arrived, in an avalanche of arrant nonsense.       
One of Royal's first five incorporators, lawyer Herbert C. Zellhoefer.

            It is true that a certificate of incorporation of the Royal Typewriter Company was filed in Trenton, New Jersey, on January 26, 1904. The incorporators were a group of five lawyers and investors headed by Francis Ray Foraker (1851-1934) and Herbert Charles Zellhoefer (1878-1951), and the company’s registered office was 51 Newark Street, Hoboken. The capital stock of $1.5 million was divided into 1000 shares common and 500 shares of 7 per cent cumulative preferred. There was no Thomas Fortune Ryan, Edward Bernard Hess or Lewis Cary Myers involved in the incorporation process, and none of the five lawyers are mentioned in Bruce Bliven’s 1954 quasi Royal history, The Wonderful Writing Machine (which was presumably published to mark what Royal believed to be its 50th anniversary). What is certain is that nothing more concrete than  incorporation occurred in Royal’s timeline in 1904 and 1905.
        Between 1898 and 1901 Hess was patenting typewriter designs assigned to the Century Machine Company, Mechanical Improvements Company, Union Typewriter Company and Visible Writing Machine Company. Two of his designs from 1901, one regarding typebar linkages and the other to the flatbed layout that would become the first Royal typewriter, were both renewed in 1905 and assigned to the Royal company incorporated in Hoboken.  At that time Hess was mainly working with Joseph Stoughton, not Myers. Stoughton’s involvement is not mentioned by Bliven.
        The first Royal typewriter emerged from a factory at the foot of 46th Street and Second Avenue, Bay Ridge, South Brooklyn, in September 1906, and within three months Royal was looking for “stationers, bank cashiers and men who are hustlers” to find easy pickings by becoming agents for the typewriter. Meanwhile, the output of the Brooklyn plant was increased to almost five times its original capacity.
Thomas Fortune Ryan (1851-1928)
        On June 1, 1907, the tobacco, insurance and transportation magnate Thomas Fortune Ryan made it officially known that he had became involved with Royal. On that day Ryan announced on Wall Street that he had appointed his son, Allan Aloysius Ryan, as president and treasurer of the company. In fact, Allan Ryan had been installed as president by Royal stockholders on April 15, and was at the head of a board which included Hess, Edward Manning, Jacob Neahr and, representing the ridiculously wealthy Guggenheim family, Simon Robert Guggenheim (1861-1949). From that date Allan Ryan had been busy seeking out a site for a new Royal factory in Hartford, Connecticut, having already headhunted Underwood's Hartford-based general manager Manning. But from the day of the Wall Street announcement, the Ryans began to make it clear their sights were on much larger targets than simply pushing a new typewriter on the market. They claimed they had a confrontation with the Union typewriter trust in mind – and the ultimate typewriter trust was said to be their weapon of war.
Allan Aloysius Ryan (1880-1940)
According to Bliven, Thomas Ryan “didn’t say a word to the press when he handed Hess and Meyers [sic] $200,000 and told them to go ahead with the Royal typewriter.” I turns out the Ryan family’s plans went way beyond just Royal. They weren’t in the least bit afraid to “say a word to the press” across the United States about a merger of “all the typewriting companies of any consequence in this country in a giant trust”.
Typewriter Topics' take on the matter:
       “Purpose hardly concealed,” reported The Brooklyn Daily Eagle on September 6, 1907. Referring to the Union Trust put together by Remington in 1893, the Eagle stated, “This is to gather in rivals of the present trust, and then to compel the latter to surrender”. So the idea was not just to bring a new typewriter on to the market, but in the process to crush what was left of Remington’s cartel (Smith Premier, Densmore, Yost, New Century and Monarch).  “This company [Royal] is backed by some of the most powerful financial interests in the United States,” added the Eagle, saying the merger “will be an accomplished fact inside of a year.” The companies targeted by Royal, as identified by the Eagle, were Underwood, L.C. Smith, Oliver, Williams, Stearns, Moyer and Blickensderfer, each of which would continue to be sold under their original brand names.
Former US Vice-President Levi Parsons Morton (1824-1920)
Thomas Ryan’s Royal team, headed up by his son Allan, had Hess as vice-president and secretary, and financier and long-standing Mergenthaler Linotype Company president Philip Tell Dodge as one of the directors. Offices were set up in the Postal Telegraph Building, Broadway and Murray Street, Manhattan, and plans were already well advanced to set up a large new factory in Hartford, Connecticut. Major stakeholders included such financial heavyweights the Guggenheim brothers – Isaac, Daniel, Maurice, Solomon, Benjamin, Simon and William - Harry Payne Whitney, former US vice-president Levi Parsons Morton, steel magnate Charles Michael Schwab and close Ryan ally John B. McDonald, the Irish-born builder of the first New York subway. With that sort of monetary oomph behind it, how could Royal possibly fail? Or the mooted merger for that matter? An “in-the-know” Royal source told the Eagle, “It may be put down as certain that the capitalists behind the Royal company did not embark in that enterprise merely for the purpose of placing a new machine on the market. In combination lies the only salvation of the typewriter business in this country.”
Harry Payne Whitney (1872-1930)
Allan Ryan told the Eagle, “The typewriter business has never been properly developed in this or any other country. No one seemed to grasp the possibilities of the situation and, after careful investigation, I and my associates formed the present company for the purpose of developing the business to its full extent.” He went on to talk about increasing Royal’s sphere of influence in the typewriter world.
Edward James Manning (1865-1938)
From a purely typewriter point of view, the success of the Ryans in luring the massively experienced Edward James Manning away from Underwood, where he’d been a technical mastermind for 17 years, was the greatest coup of all. Manning changed camps on April 5, 1907, (his employees gave him a diamond ring as a going-away gift). Manning followed Jacob Eugene Neahr, who in October 1906 was recruited from Underwood to take care of Royal sales. The pair joined Royal’s new board of directors. Manning was appointed general manager and brought with him his English-born offsider Charles Belnap Cook. As well, the Ryans robbed Underwood of its auditor Charles Marvin Burlingame, who became company accountant at Royal. Royal went on to cherry pick Underwood staff across the country – Iowa state manager and highly successful salesman Tom Symonds switched sides in Des Moines in April 1907, as just one example. Another was Arthur Rattray, who went from Hartford to New York in mid-May, to be joined by W.A. Wells in September. M.F. Klopfenstein and his repairman Harry L. Newhard followed suit from Allentown, Pennsylvania, in late June, and Charles F. Courtney of Reading, Pennslyvania, in September. Right across the US, typewriter people were showing enormous advance faith in the new product.
One of the first newspaper adverts to appear after the Ryan takeover of Royal was placed by Tom Symonds in the Des Moines Register on November 10, 1907.
Allan Ryan claimed the typewriter industry, as conducted in 1907, was “practically in its infancy”. Of the 80 million in the US, and millions in other “civilised countries”, a great many wanted typewriters, but he estimated “only about 250,000” were made in 1906. The “total yearly output is ridiculously small.” Ryan said that within 10 years Royal’s new plant would produce 140,000 typewriters a year alone (70,000 was the initial projected output). “I also believe that there will be a legitimate demand for all the machines that can be made.”
Charles Michael Schwab (1862-1939)
On September 14, 1907, The Los Angeles Herald followed the Brooklyn Eagle’s story under the headline "Think Ryan heads typewriter trust: New Royal company may absorb Remington:  Schwab, Guggenheim and Other Prominent Capitalists Representing Many Millions Are Interested In Concern.” It said, “Rumors have been heard for some time that a group of American capitalists, with Thomas F. Ryan at their head, were forming a large company to acquire all the largest typewriter interests in the country and to obtain control of the business, all over the world.” The Herald said the consortium had “combined holdings … sufficient to effect an absolute monopoly of the typewriter business. “It was learned that the Royal Typewriter Company is the nucleus of the big enterprise and that a plant, said to be the largest of the kind in the world is now being erected in Hartford, Connecticut. Several of the chief men of the Underwood Typewriter Company have been employed by the Ryan concern and two of them have been made directors of the new company.”

The Herald quoted Neahr as saying, “Up to the present time we have been giving most of our attention to the foreign trade. The foreign market for American typewriters is something enormous and will continue to grow. In the matter of making typewriters, Europeans are just where we were 12 years ago, and our great difficulty just now is to make our machines as fast as they are sold abroad. We have just closed a contract for 6000 machines in England, and have sold 200 recently to the French government.
        “In Hartford we are putting up the largest typewriter factory in the world, and are offering all sorts of inducements to workmen to complete it as rapidly as possible.” Asked about “the so-called Royal Typewriter Company” absorbing other large American typewriter concerns, Neahr replied, “I shall not discuss that part of the business, but you may draw your own conclusions. The Royal machine was perfected only a year ago and has not been placed on the market here [in the US] to any extent. But capitalists who have made a careful investigation are satisfied that there is a big future in the business and the new company has succeeded in procuring the services of some of the best typewriter experts in the world. We have about 12 from the Underwood company.” Neahr said 25 “of the strongest capitalists in the country” were stockholders in the new company, but they didn’t want their names mentioned “until certain negotiations now pending are closed”.
Philip Tell Dodge (1851-1931)
The involvement of Wisconsin-born, Washington-based Philip Tell Dodge in the Royal establishment is interesting. He had had a long involvement in the typewriter business. He was patent attorney for the first typewriter design from Christopher Latham Sholes, Carlos Glidden and Samuel Willard Soulé. Dodge was also employed by Sholes to patent his machine for printing numbers, and the previous year Sholes and Soulé employed Dodge's father, William Castle Dodge, as their patent attorney for an earlier version of this machine. Philip Dodge went on to become a patent counsel for Remington and it was he who secured the Byron Alden Brooks patent for the shift device first used on the Remington 2 in 1878. Starting in late 1891, Dodge served 37 years as general manager and president of the Mergenthaler Linotype Company.
Given the financial clout behind Royal, and the company’s boasts about its production and sales capacities, the good aldermen of Hartford, Connecticut, must have been astounded to read in September 1907 of ambitions for global domination. Three months earlier, on June 10, 1907, a petition from Manning for Royal to be relieved from assessment of taxes for five years was discussed by Hartford’s board of aldermen, board of finance and a joint special committee. It was found the alderman, though they agreed to a three-year abatement, didn’t have the power to help Royal. The typewriter company had bought 5¼ acres of land for its new Hartford factory on May 25, 1907. In April it had considered Manchester, nine miles east of Hartford, but on Manning’s insistence settled on Hartford. It was merely a return to home turf for Manning. The Hartford factory was opened on March 14, 1908. Heavy advertising in New York newspapers for the Royal typewriter started in October 1908.
There were two obvious benefits from the brouhaha about the “gigantic” Royal typewriter trust. First, the Royal typewriter received more, and more widespread, publicity than, even with its big backers, it could possibly have afforded in paid advertising. Second, it immediately proved bad publicity for the more established companies mentioned, such as Underwood, whose officials reacted with immediate denials and stated Underwood had never been, nor ever would be, part of a trust. There was far more at stake than in the first match between the two company teams in the Hartford Church Bowling League on March 19, 1908. But by then, talk of the ultimate typewriter trust was long dead.
 Typewriter Topics, September 1907:

Saturday, 7 December 2013

Emeric Somlo Typewriter Collection Auction Results

The Emeric Somlo
Typewriter Collection
Auction
Young’s Auctions
Melbourne, Australia
November 29, 2013


To say there are surprises here would be an understatement. But, as I forecast, there were many, many bargains to be had.

LOT 1 MERRITT $450
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 2 ODELL $450
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 3 WORLD $425
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 4 AMERICAN $325
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 5 BENNETT $160
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 6 JUNIOR $140
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 7 STERLING $850
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 8 STANDARD FOLDING $170
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 9 STANDARD FOLDING $150
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 10 BIJOU FOLDING $160
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 11 CORONA 3 $250
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 12 CORONA 4 $190
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 13 EMPIRE $260
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 14 EMPIRE $240
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 15 ADLER $240
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 16 ADLER BILLING N/P
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 17 ADLER  15 $200
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 18 EMPIRE 2 $140
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 19 IMPERIAL B $500
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 20 IMPERIAL D $140
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 21 NOISELESS PORTABLE $300
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 22 POSTAL $460
ESTIMATE 500-800 
LOT 23 BLICKENSDERFER 7 $425
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 28 SALTER 6 $475
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 29 ROYAL BAR-LOCK 10 $500
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 30 ROYAL BAR-LOCK $400
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 31 NEW YOST $750
ESTIMATE 1000-1500
LOT 32 YOST 11 $700
ESTIMATE 1000-1500
LOT 33 OLIVER 3 $450
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 34 NEW CENTURY 6 $475
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 35 PITTSBURG 10 $425
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 36 HAMMOND 1 $1150
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 37 HAMMOND 12 $575
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 38 VARITYPER N/P
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 39 HAMMOND MULTIPLEX 26 $250
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 40 CHICAGO $475
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 41 REMINGTON NOISELESS PORTABLE $220
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 42 REMINGTON NOISELESS PORTABLE $220
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 43 ROYAL PORTABLE $140
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 44 CORONA 3 $200
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 45 CORONA 3 $220
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 46 UNDERWOOD 3 $170
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 47 UNDERWOOD 3 $140
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 48 REMINGTON MODEL 1 PORTABLE $140
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 49 REMINGTON PORTABLE $150
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 50 IMPERIAL GOOD COMPANION MODEL T $130 ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 51 BIJOU FOLDING & UNDERWOOD 3 $100
ESTIMATE 100-200
LOT 52 GUNDKA FROLIO 5 $170
ESTIMATE 200-300
LOT 53 SIMPLEX N/P
ESTIMATE 150-250
LOT 54 PRACTICAL 1 N/P
ESTIMATE 150-250
LOT 55 2 GSN JUNIORS $140
ESTIMATE 150-250
LOT 56 STANDARD FOLDING $130
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 57 EDELMANN $475
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 58 BLICKENSDERFER 5 $475
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 59 MIGNON 2 $525
ESTIMATE 600-900
LOT 60 MIGNON 4 $400
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 61 MIGNON 4 $400
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 78 DENSMORE N/P
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 79 ORGA PRIVATE N/P
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 80 ORGA $150
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 81 AMC $150
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 82 IDEAL 23 $400
ESTIMATE 500-700
LOT 83 SMITH PREMIER 4 $140
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 84 L.C.SMITH $170
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 85 L.C.SMITH SILENT $100
ESTIMATE 100-200
LOT 86 SMITH PREMIER  & ROYAL (10?) $140
ESTIMATE 100-200
LOT 87 MONARCH 3 $240
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 88 MONARCH 2 $400
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 89 BAR-LOCK 22 & AEG STANDARD $130
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 90 REMINGTON 6 $240
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 91 REMINGTON 7 $300
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 92 REMINGTON 8 $300
ESTIMATE 400-600
LOT 93 REMINGTON 10 $600
ESTIMATE 500-800
LOT 94 REMINGTON 10 $200
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 95 REMINGTON 12 $240
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 96 REMINGTON 16 $200
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 97 REMINGTON NOISELESS 6 $200
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 98 REMINGTON 11 with WAHL REGISTER $200
ESTIMATE 300-500
LOT 99 REMINGTON 11 $130
ESTIMATE 150-250
LOT 100 SMITH PREMIER 10A $180
ESTIMATE 250-450
LOT 101 UNDERWOOD 4 $150
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 102 UNDERWOOD 5 Passed in
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 103 UNDERWOOD 3 $130
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 104 UNDERWOOD 4 Passed in
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 105 UNDERWOOD 5 $100
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 106 UNDERWOOD STANDARD $100
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 107 UNDERWOOD NOISELESS STANDARD $140
ESTIMATE 200-400
LOT 108 FOX 4 $260
ESTIMATE 300-400
LOT 109 ROYAL STANDARD 1 $475
ESTIMATE 600-800
LOT 110 ROYAL 10 $150
ESTIMATE 200-400

LOT 111 ROYAL KHM Passed in
ESTIMATE 300-400
LOT 112 ROYAL 10 $140
ESTIMATE  200-300


TOTAL KNOWN SALES $23,775
96 ITEMS, 87 KNOWN SALES, 3 PASSED IN, 6 NO PRICES (Average $273)
LOW ESTIMATE: $29,850 (Average $311)
HIGH ESTIMATE: $48,550 (Average $506)