Total Pageviews

Friday, 26 November 2021

Life of a Typewriter Technician (Installment 7 - Training on the Facit 1850)


                                            By Guest Poster Michael Klein

Continuing my story (last installment July 28, 2020) of a young wet-behind-the-ears school leaver, navigating a career with a Melbourne office equipment supplier, servicing all brands of typewriters, but specialising in the Swedish brand Facit.

One morning, on arriving at work, my boss, the shop owner and salesman, was in a somewhat furtive conversation with my supervisor Norm (the senior typewriter technician and my mentor). I had been at the organisation long enough to know not to eavesdrop on such conversations, as these were a regular occurrence and were often dodgy deals being hatched, so I took the hint and disappeared to buy a cake and drink from the milkbar next door.


On my return, the boss somewhat sheepishly approached me and asked if I wished to partake in a week-long technical training course on the new Facit golfball typewriter about to hit the market. I couldn’t understand what all the cloak and dagger was about, but with hindsight, I suspect my boss was sounding out with my supervisor whether I would be technically capable and if it would be worth the investment in me being off the tools for a week’s training.

Well, you could have knocked me over with a feather – this training offer was beyond anything I had been expecting. Not only had my supervisor given me the tick of approval, which in itself was a huge ego boost, but my boss was giving me the opportunity to become the “golfball specialist” within the company. My supervisor was a very old school typewriter mechanic, having come up through the ranks of what was then almost a full-blown apprenticeship, albeit not a recognised trade. He nevertheless had spend many years with a company called Sydney Pincombe, then later with Philips when they bought out Facit. What he didn’t know about manual and electric Facit typewriters wasn’t worth [type]writing about! However, golfballs always seemed to be a bit beyond him, or maybe he wasn’t inclined to want to learn of their intricacies late in his career. I, on the other hand, was a very enthusiastic young lad at the time, always willing and eager to learn about new mechanical devices and concepts.


Norm took me into the training facility, so that he could introduce me to some of the fellow technicians, who, while they were with opposition companies, he obviously knew by first name. I also arrived late in the morning, when the class had already started, further adding to the mystique around the last-minute decision to send me on the course rather than Norm, who was obviously enrolled in the course originally.

I couldn’t contain my excitement of being there. I may as well have been starting on a rocket maintenance course, such was the regard I held for these complex machines that I was to spend the next week playing with. I was also the youngest chap in the course, which further boosted the sense of self-importance I felt within myself by being there amongst a group of very experienced technicians. Many of the course participants went on to become long-term associates, with one in particular displaying dodgy business practices just like my current employer (more of this in later installments, no doubt).

June 1978 Australian newspaper ad

The IBM golfball was regarded in the industry as something quite untouchable, as IBM had a very tight control of the market for its machine. It was only sold through their own sales channels, and the spare parts and service literature was very tightly controlled, making it extremely difficult for small dealerships such as ourselves to be able to service or repair the complex machines. In fact IBM behaved in many ways similar to, say, a Mercedes dealership does today by restricting availability to service manuals, mechanic specialist training and software diagnostics, so the local mechanic has no hope in being able to service these cars. It was at this time (around the mid-1970s) that the worldwide patent on the IBM golfball ran out, allowing all the other manufacturers to step in and take a slice of a lucrative market. They also had an advantage in looking back on some 20 years of stifled progress and to be able to come out with some very innovative approaches to golfball typewriter designs, by not being shackled to having to keep a flawed design in production to get return on sunk investment costs. Ford suffered the same fate with the Model-T car in that they would not, or could not, change the basic design for decades while new innovations came to market from nimble competitors.

March 1977 United States newspaper ad

Facit was one of those manufacturers who turned the golfball design on its head, coming up with a machine that addressed all that was wrong with IBM’s somewhat tired and dated offering. Many of the parts in the IBM that either broke or needed constant adjustment, due to inherent poor design, were simply engineered out of existence due to the new crisp and stylish Swedish design.

During training, we each had a brand-new machine to play with for a week, under the guidance of an engineer from the factory in Sweden. Facit had just been bought out by the multinational Electrolux group, of vacuum cleaner and whitegoods fame. I spent a week pulling my machine apart and putting it back together and adjusting it to make it all work again. We had the opportunity during that week to take apart components that ordinarily wouldn’t have to be disassembled during the life of the machine. We really got to know the inner workings of those typewriters!

The instructor’s first language wasn’t English, and the class got accustomed to this and managed to adapt so that he could understand us and we could understand him. However, there was a somewhat amusing yet delicate episode when one day the instructor wore his stylish (in Europe, no doubt) suit to the class. It was a VERY lairish shade of green (almost like Kermit the frog), and it was somewhat difficult for the class to contain themselves and to stop sniggering and breaking out into uproarious laughter throughout the day. Towards the end of the day, one of our fellow students made a side joke in what we thought would be a disguised manner, by weaving some Australian slang into the statement to try and hide the fact we were poking fun at the instructor’s dress sense. Well,  the instructor obviously had a better command of English than we’d bargained for and he turned somewhat red with rage. Having put up with us  whispering about him all day, this last joke was the final straw. Needless to say we toned it down after that episode and didn’t pick on the instructor anymore.

After the course finished, we all said our goodbyes and went out into the world equipped with the knowledge to become Facit golfball typewriter experts. To this young lad, it was a pinnacle of my career path. I was about to embark on what were, to me, very exciting times.

June 1977 US newspaper ad

The golfball typewriter was a very expensive item, retailing at around $1800; considering that an average family-sized car cost around $4000 at the time, this will place the cost of the typewriter at probably $22,500 in today’s money – a huge investment for a company, and one usually only made for executive secretaries. There were very few of these machines sold to home users - they were almost purely a corporate business tool. There was good markup to be had on them as well, which led to some very competitive sales tactics amongst the small fraternity that was the office equipment supply market in those days.

We had the advantage of having a large number of Facit service contracts, which also gave us a shoe-in for sales. I suspect that the bulk of the customers we had on the books came as a result of Philips relinquishing the Facit franchise, as staff at our shop were ex-Philips employees. Also, a gift to us was that not many of the other smaller typewriter shops seemed to have anywhere near the range of Facits under contract as we did, nor did they seem to have a desire to step into that space, as it was somewhat a niche market compared to IBM and Remington, who had a huge portion of the market.


Over time, we very successfully migrated many of our customers from the Facit 1820 (a very robust workhorse of an electric typewriter) to the Facit golfball - the model 1850. But with success comes some angst as well, as we soon discovered that there was a design flaw in one of the components that controlled the shift function (in a golfball, this is achieved by rotating the ball through 180 degrees, compared to lifting the conventional typebar basket up and down, or in the case of many portables, shifting the platen up and down to make the upper or lower case letters strike the paper). Because of the speed that the golfball operates at, this part was under a lot of stress and would break after about a year in service, and due to the design of the Facit 1850, a complete module had to be replaced. Eventually a better designed mechanism came out in the next model release, but this would have cost our Australian wholesaler a fortune, as it was its responsibility to make good on all of this disaster. We would have replaced dozens (hundreds perhaps) of these modules; it’s not just the cost of the effort in physically replacing the part, the pick up and dropping back of the typewriter to the customer (it wasn’t practical to do this job onsite), but there was probably untold loss of goodwill and the customers’ faith in Facit as a product, after having invested much of their hard-earned capital in a fleet of typewriters.


I don’t know if it was all of this, plus the logistics of the wholesaler having the unexpected impost of having to import all those replacement parts, that contributed to their ultimate demise a few years later, but there were other factors at play with this particular wholesaler. It simply wasn’t a big enough set up to be able to service their network of resellers Australia-wide in the way that Philips used to be.

 I thoroughly enjoyed the years in which I had the good fortune to work on Facit typewriters, and in particular my privileged opportunity to specialise in the Facit golfball. They stood me in good stead when I was to later apply for a job at Remington, which turned out to be another major turning point in the career of this naive young lad.

14 comments:

Bill M said...

I guess IBM Selectric flaws were not as bad as Facit noted since there are still many IBM Selectrics in use and few Facits. I've also never seen a Facit golf ball machine in real life or for sale.

Richard P said...

I have never run across a Facit golf-ball machine either.

The price tag on these things was astounding!

chup said...

hey, i just stumbled upon your post. are you really saying that my beautiful and seemingly indestructable monster machine is inevitably going to break? i (obviously) got it used, it looks like it's in good condition, but that paragraph about having to replace that module does not sound good at all :o what can i do if it breaks? are there early warning symptoms? do you happen to have a few replacement modules laying around..?

Steve said...

Not hopeful of a response given the unanswered 2023 question but here goes...
That was a great read, I'm naturally intrigued by the comment "...that addressed all that was wrong with IBM’s somewhat tired and dated offering". Specifically what innovations did Facit introduce that were superior (and long-lasting) over the Selectric?
You've added some interesting technical images, do you still have the original Service Manual that could be scanned for the interest of others with one of these machines?

Michael K said...

sorry for the [very] late reply, just got alerted to this post ! The module fails without warning - it's a lever that controls the shift which breaks. I have successfully welded a broken one in the past. Unfortunately I don't have a spare module I can share with you. The problem was fixed in series II of the machine (which has a reduction gear on the shift cam that effectively halves the speed at which the shift lever bashes against it's indent stop) - i.e. it's a pleasant clunk, rather than a violent crashing noise as previously !

cheers, Michael.

chup said...

thanks for your reply, i was waiting patiently all that time :D just kidding. she still works btw! the first few lines of text are garbled, letters come out almost at random, but that just stops after a minute or so and everything is fine.. it's a little weird, but i got used to it :)

Michael K said...

From the description of your symptoms, it sounds like it needs a good service & adjustment - if you happen to reside in Vic, AU I would happily service it for you. The breaking part issue is unlikely to happen to a home user or collector - it only happens to machines that are being constantly pounded 7 hours a day by efficient secretaries, so in your case unlikely to break in yours [or your grand-kids] lifetime !

Michael K said...

Hi Steve (in response to 2 Oct 2026 post)...

Some of the innovations that Facit introduced were :

1. Rotate/Tilt tapes – in the IBM, there was a single rotate tape under spring tension, which inherently causes the tape and all ancillary components to stretch over time (particularly under heavy usage as in an office situation), needing constant re-adjustment every six months or so, else it starts typing misaligned characters, or in a worst case spitting out wrong characters, leading to broken components.

Facit’s design was to have two opposing tapes under a much reduced tension, pulling the golf-ball either way, hence giving a somewhat self-centering operation that needed minimal adjustment over time.

I’d have to say that the most common call-out reason on the IBM was the rotate tape breaking; I’d be lying if I said Facit rotate tapes never broke, but they just didn’t seem to break that often due to their light loading.

2. Cycle clutch – the IBM cycle clutch was very complex to replace and adjust, and also needed constant adjustment over time, as it’s timing being out could also cause misalignment or wrong characters to appear. The single screw on the adjustment collar for the cycle clutch controlled four adjustments, all inter-related and needing to be adjusted precisely to thousandths of an inch tolerances, else you had no hope of the machine ever typing the right characters at all ! Also, there needed to be a very specific type of grease injected into the clutch, which if left long enough between servicing would dry up, harden and cause all sorts of timing issues, manifesting again in misaligned / wrong characters.

Facit simply didn’t have any of this complexity at all; if a cycle clutch spring needed replacing, it just slotted in requiring no adjustments (in fact there were no adjustment mechanisms on this other than a three hole selection of where the end of the spring is inserted). Such was the precision of the engineering, that adjustments simply weren’t needed, all was held in with circlips and precise manufacturing tolerances. Also no need to regularly grease it – an occasional drop of light oil is all that’s needed !

3. Space / backspace cams. In the IBM, these were some highly stressed parts that were under enormous pressure, were constantly wearing out the cam followers, hence another cause of needing constant adjustment. The service methodology was to simply apply copious amounts of grease all over these cams; but this was only a temporary masking of what was inherently a design fault.

Facit on the other hand completely re-thought the design and had far less stress on all components in general (eg. by utilising two draw-bands to push/pull the carriage assembly, rather than the single drawband under enormous spring tension as in the IBM). Also, these cam functions were being performed by nylon cams, rather than steel cams, and being under extremely light loads meant long life and time between adjustment / refurbishment cycles.

cut into multiple posts...

Anonymous said...

... continuation of prev post (was too big to post as one)…

Hi Steve (in response to 2 Oct 2026 post)...


4. Motor start clutch. The IBM inherently needed a lot of torque to turn over all the highly stressed components, which unfortunately the motor couldn’t deliver on startup. The solution was to install a centrifugal clutch allowing the motor to spin up to speed before being fully engaged. The complexity and weak design of this component caused much noise when it went wrong, and in worst case caused a horrible shuddering noise on startup eventually leading to the clutch needing replacement. Facit didn’t have any of these issues of course, as all components were under a light enough strain that the motor had enough starting torque to start up whilst being fully engaged.


5. overall quietness. The IBM was a very noisy machine (although, a lot of the noise issues were vastly improved in the series III Selectric). The Facit was definitely a quieter machine.


All of the above is just my opinion based on some of the issues from the most frequent things needing attention when servicing these highly complex machines. I’m happy to be corrected by IBM Selectric fans of course ! I'm not knocking the IBM design per se. - it was a brilliant machine in it's day. But like the Model T ford, sometimes manufacturers won't or cannot change tooling & assembly lines etc. and need a bit of encouragement to improve and that nudge comes in the form of competition from other manufacturers.

The golfball (including IBM and all other variants) is perhaps the pinnacle of mechanical design in the dying days of typewriters before PC’s became the vogue. The speed and accuracy of ball alignment before hitting the paper at precisely the correct pressure never ceases to amaze me. It’s a wonder it does the job it does !

I have some service manuals buried in my archives somewhere, I’ll dig them up and post shortly.

Cheers, Michael.

chup said...

thank you for the generous servicing offer! although i'm not *quite* sure if i can make it this afternoon. the internet says it's a 27h flight..! greetings from linz, austria ;) btw i never wanted to become that guy, but in the meantime i have aquired two more facit typewriters (a 8111 and a 7800), i just can't resist them :O

Michael K said...

Hi Steve (in response to 2 Oct 2026 post)...

Some of the innovations that Facit introduced were :

1. Rotate/Tilt tapes – in the IBM, there was a single rotate tape under spring tension, which inherently causes the tape and all ancillary components to stretch over time (particularly under heavy usage as in an office situation), needing constant re-adjustment every six months or so, else it starts typing misaligned characters, or in a worst case spitting out wrong characters, leading to broken components.

Facit’s design was to have two opposing tapes under a much reduced tension, pulling the golf-ball either way, hence giving a somewhat self-centering operation that needed minimal adjustment over time.

I’d have to say that the most common call-out reason on the IBM was the rotate tape breaking; I’d be lying if I said Facit rotate tapes never broke, but they just didn’t seem to break that often due to their light loading.

2. Cycle clutch – the IBM cycle clutch was very complex to replace and adjust, and also needed constant adjustment over time, as it’s timing being out could also cause misalignment or wrong characters to appear. The single screw on the adjustment collar for the cycle clutch controlled four adjustments, all inter-related and needing to be adjusted precisely to thousandths of an inch tolerances, else you had no hope of the machine ever typing the right characters at all ! Also, there needed to be a very specific type of grease injected into the clutch, which if left long enough between servicing would dry up, harden and cause all sorts of timing issues, manifesting again in misaligned / wrong characters.

Facit simply didn’t have any of this complexity at all; if a cycle clutch spring needed replacing, it just slotted in requiring no adjustments (in fact there were no adjustment mechanisms on this other than a three hole selection of where the end of the spring is inserted). Such was the precision of the engineering, that adjustments simply weren’t needed, all was held in with circlips and precise manufacturing tolerances. Also no need to regularly grease it – an occasional drop of light oil is all that’s needed !

3. Space / backspace cams. In the IBM, these were some highly stressed parts that were under enormous pressure, were constantly wearing out the cam followers, hence another cause of needing constant adjustment. The service methodology was to simply apply copious amounts of grease all over these cams; but this was only a temporary masking of what was inherently a design fault.

Facit on the other hand completely re-thought the design and had far less stress on all components in general. Also, these cam functions were being performed by nylon cams, rather than steel cams, and being under extremely light loads meant long life and time between adjustment / refurbishment cycles.

4. Motor start clutch. The IBM inherently needed a lot of torque to turn over all the highly stressed components, which unfortunately the motor couldn’t deliver on startup. The solution was to install a centrifugal clutch allowing the motor to spin up to speed before being fully engaged. The complexity and weak design of this component caused much noise when it went wrong, and in worst case caused a horrible shuddering noise on startup eventually leading to the clutch needing replacement. Facit didn’t have any of these issues of course, as all components were under a light enough strain that the motor had enough starting torque to start up whilst being fully engaged.


Anonymous said...

Hi Steve (in response to 2 Oct 2026 post)...

(continuation of last reply as was too big to post as one)...


5. overall quietness. The IBM was a very noisy machine (although, a lot of the noise issues were vastly improved in the series III Selectric). The Facit was definitely a quieter machine.

All of the above is just my opinion based on some of the issues from the most frequent things needing attention when servicing these highly complex machines. I’m happy to be corrected by IBM Selectric fans of course !

The golfball (including IBM and all other variants) is perhaps the pinnacle of mechanical design in the dying days of typewriters before PC’s became the vogue. The speed and accuracy of ball alignment before hitting the paper at precisely the correct pressure never ceases to amaze me. It’s a wonder it does the job it does !

I have some service manuals buried in my archives somewhere, I’ll dig them up and post shortly.

Cheers, Michael.

Michael K said...

Hi Chup, Yes, there is something special about Facit design - the style, the elegance & the sheer simplicity and robustness of the engineering make for an all-round wonderful package ! I used to travel to Wien occasionally - maybe I'll get to see your Facit collection someday.

Anonymous said...

let me know when you are in town michael, i'll give you the tour. who knows how many it will be then :)