Factory Direct
Imperial’s Gift of a Good Companion
to
a Good Companion
also
The End of Days
Imperial's Hull workers take on Litton
Plan to make typewriters of their own
It would be an incredible experience to visit a typewriter factory today. Imagine how cool it would be to do that and then be given a free, brand-new portable typewriter!
More on that story shortly. In the meantime ...
Vikram Shah’s comment on my post about Ernest Hemingway and the Kansas City Star’s style sheet arrived
just as I was sitting down to write about my friend Elizabeth Manning Murphy
and her Imperial Good Companion 5 portable typewriter.
Elizabeth is one of Australia’s leading editors and an author on
the art of writing and editing, so it seemed highly appropriate to hear from
Vikram on these subjects.
“It strikes me,” wrote Vikram, “that many of the [Kansas City Star style] rules shown
here seem not to apply to most of my high school English classes. Until AP composition
my junior year, I was taught basically that longer sentences meant less
headache at the keys and more pages to turn in. Nowhere in there was quality a
huge concern. When my teacher suddenly told me that my writing was subpar, I
quickly learned to write with meaning, with heart, with a correct prose style,
and I believe it'll stick with me.”
It’s a shame Vikram’s teacher hadn’t read Elizabeth Manning
Murphy, president of the Canberra Society of Editors, which last August
published Elizabeth’s much-acclaimed book Working
Words: For Editors, Writers, Teachers, Students of English Grammar and Wordsmiths
All.
Elizabeth had previously written such works as Effective Writing: Plain English at Work
(1989),
Working Words is a
collection of “chats” about aspects of editing and writing, many of which
happened as a direct result of requests made to Elizabeth from working editors, would-be-editors
and people who didn’t learn the “whys” and “wherefores” of English grammar at
school. Chapters include “Punctuation: marks that matter”, “What is style?” and
“The future of words”.
Elizabeth is a trained linguist, a consultant in communication
skills, an editor and a trainer in effective writing. She is an associate of
the Society for Editors and Proofreaders (Britain) and received the honorary
award of distinguished editor from the Institute of Professional Editors,
Australia, in 2008. She graduated with an honours
bachelor’s degree in linguistics from the Australian National University in
Canberra.
Paul Hetherington, of the Writing Program, University of
Canberra, said of Working Words that it is a “very interesting and
straightforward companion [Good Companion?] for people concerned with good written English and
editing. It addresses important issues about style, grammar and punctuation,
and combines these elements in a chatty, accessible and practical way. There's
also very useful content about liaison and communication, which is especially
valuable for beginning editors."
OK, so these are Elizabeth’s credentials. Now for her favourite
writing machine: At the end of a guided tour of the Imperial Typewriter
Company’s factory in Hull in the north-east of England in about 1961, Elizabeth
and a friend were astonished to be given gifts of Imperial Good Companion Model
5 portable typewriters each.
Elizabeth still has her IGC 5, 51 years on, and it’s much used
but still in immaculate condition. The serial number is 5D 048, which suggests
it was part of the remaining stock of a model about to be phased out for the Model 6
(introduced 1961).
Imperial had added to its original factory in Leicester, in the East Midlands, with the Hull factory in 1954. Hull was to be devoted to portable typewriter production while Leicester concentrated on the Imperial Model 66 standard-sized machine.
THE END OF IMPERIAL
Fourteen years after
Elizabeth’s visit, the Imperial typewriter factory in Hull was not such a happy,
giving place. Litton Industries had announced on February 21, 1975, that it
would close its Leicester and Hull typewriter factories, saying they were “unprofitable”. As workers
filed home, a coffin draped in a Union Jack sat in the city’s streets,
signifying the end of a once great typewriter brand. See.
On March 7, the Tribune magazine, Britain’s
independent democratic socialist weekly, published an article by Ken Coates
which was scathing about Litton’s tactics. It was a nasty business, with the
fascist National Front having blamed striking Asian workers for the Litton decision.
Trouble was truly brewing when, on Friday, February 28, workers staged a sit-in
and talked of forming a workers’ cooperative to
continue typewriter production in Britain. Unions and employees
envisaged a “workers' self-management of the new enterprises which
will replace the old Litton empire”.
Litton “did everything possible
to create pressures on the Hull workers to abandon their occupation of the
plant. First, it threatened to withhold redundancy payments until it was given
possession of the factory. Not unnaturally, this caused some distress,
particularly among that section of the workers which had decided to accept
dismissal. But then, to tighten the screw still further, the company announced
that it would also withhold wages which were due, on the same basis.”
Imperial's Hull typewriter factory
The
employees agreed “not to fall into Litton’s trap”, and some workers who had
initially opposed the sit-in decided to join it. The Transport and General
Workers’ Union commissioned universities in the area to carry out research on
Litton’s financial position and its claims about the Imperial typewriter
factories being unviable. However, the workers found these unsatisfactory. In
particular, the workers demanded to know, “if the factories are to be viable, a
distribution mechanism must be found which can market their product. At the
moment, Litton thinks that it can pull out of producing machines in Britain,
and yet retain the absolute right to market in the United Kingdom the
typewriters which they manufacture abroad. Office and Electronic Machines
(OEM), a British company, is presently expected to market Triumph-Adler
machines, manufactured by Litton's German subsidiary.
“If the Urwick-Orr study
had been a true social audit, it would have needed to consider and carefully
weigh such things as the balance of payments implications of this assumption.
Be that as it may, the union is now seeking to arouse public concern about this
matter. One solution, it might be thought, could be to nationalise OEM. Short
of that, possibly a government agency could be established to compete in the
office equipment business. Perhaps the Stationery Office could expand its
scope, or possibly a new agency could be created to cope with this field of
work. Public enterprise and government purchases alone could provide a very serious
basic market.
"Alternatively, OEM could be pressed, on balance of payments
grounds, to agree to become the representatives of the new Hull-Leicester
workers' enterprises. Whatever the solution which is finally agreed,
however, it is clearly quite improper for a trans-national company to abandon
its productive obligations to a country, and at the same time expect to exploit
that country's markets unhampered in any way.”
“Of course, if workers'
cooperatives do take over at Hull and Leicester, there will be large problems
of adjustment. If one takes a middle-term view, of maybe 10 years or so, it is
very likely that the demand for typewriters will decrease, if not fade away.
Message-sending is by-passing the letter, and beyond the telex we can see even
more audacious forms of electronic communication.
“The long-term future of a
factory in the message-sending industry may well turn out to be in the [British] Post
Office, meeting the demand for advanced message hardware in the late 1980s. An
alternative possible evolution might be into the kinds of mechanical
engineering which use sophisticated keyboards for blending paints, or in
chemicals plastics and other industries.
“These are all matters which will need
to be considered in due time, but the first priority is to maintain the skills
and organised capacity of these two important groups of work people.”
The
campaign in Hull was calling for the urgent donation of funds from the public.
6 comments:
First time I heard of the Imperials. Looks like it is one hefty typewriter. Litton or not, eventually there would be no more typewriter factories.
What a fabulous gift that was! As I noted not too long ago on my own blog, the GC5 is a first-rate typewriter.
This is an interesting and sad story about the end of Imperial. "Message-sending is by-passing the letter, and beyond the telex we can see even more audacious forms of electronic communication." -- That was prescient, but I wonder what they meant specifically by "message-sending"?
I suspect that "message-sending" simply refers to any form of long-distance communication.
I miss the idea of sending letters and postcards. It seems that so much is already communicated in emails and phone calls, there's not much left to be said in a letter. Even soldiers on the battlefield, who seemed to be the last people without access to any other form of communication besides letters, are now using email and cell phones. The personal letter seems largely dead... Boy, was that a digression, or what?
GC5 is, by a mile, my favourite thoroughbred machine. It oozes finesse. And thanks for shedding some light on the plight of the Hull factory closure.
Definitely a looker! Oh, to tour a typewriter factory, let alone be given one as a gift at the end of it. Quite a story. Just picked up a GC1 myself, and if these are anything like the one I have...well, it is both attractive and functionally to die for. 19
Thank you Bill, Richard, 'Stream', Rob and Ken for your comments.
Yes, the end for Imperial must have been a sad time, and judging by the various schemes discussed, these workers must have been desperate to come up with some way of staying in a job. Could message-sending relate to typewriters or like machines still be used for cables and telegrams?
It is interesting to note the various Labour Party-union officials involved, including Tony Benn.
The most interesting aspect to me was Litton saying it would meet Britain's needs for typewriters through a British distribution company for Triumph-Adler, and "the balance of payments implications". SCM and Olivetti were still making typewriters in Britain at this time.
Post a Comment